Kollywood actress Ranjitha, who was absconding from police since last few days, finally broke her silence by serving lawyer notices to world famous search engine ‘Google’ and ‘YouTube’ demanding to withdraw the video clippings from their web sites before May2nd, failing which she is obliged to file civil and criminal cases against them.
Her lawyer M. Prashanth stated that the video footage of his client and the Nityananda is not genuine. He said either its morphed or edited by an expert. Ranjitha is not a devotee of Nityananda, but occasionally she used to visit his ashram to hear his preaching. He said that she never happen to spend her time there for a long as she is a busy actress. Ranjitha’s lawyer asked Google and You Tube to withdraw the video footage from their sites in the given time, otherwise suggested them to prepare to face civil and criminal cases.
If, one could recall her statements given to media, in which she agreed her presence in the video and said that she is massaging the Swamiji, then it would be funny to know that she has served lawyer notice to the web sites. If, she is sure that she is not in the video clippings then why is she asking to remove them from the web sites? If, she believes that video clipping is not genuine, then why should she bother about the video clippings that are not concerned to her any way? If, she is not guilty then why is she hiding from the public and police? Why is she serving lawyer notices to web sites?
Let the time alone clear all the doubts.
Her lawyer M. Prashanth stated that the video footage of his client and the Nityananda is not genuine. He said either its morphed or edited by an expert. Ranjitha is not a devotee of Nityananda, but occasionally she used to visit his ashram to hear his preaching. He said that she never happen to spend her time there for a long as she is a busy actress. Ranjitha’s lawyer asked Google and You Tube to withdraw the video footage from their sites in the given time, otherwise suggested them to prepare to face civil and criminal cases.
If, one could recall her statements given to media, in which she agreed her presence in the video and said that she is massaging the Swamiji, then it would be funny to know that she has served lawyer notice to the web sites. If, she is sure that she is not in the video clippings then why is she asking to remove them from the web sites? If, she believes that video clipping is not genuine, then why should she bother about the video clippings that are not concerned to her any way? If, she is not guilty then why is she hiding from the public and police? Why is she serving lawyer notices to web sites?
Let the time alone clear all the doubts.
0 Responses So Far: